Bolzano’s Concept of Consequence
نویسنده
چکیده
In the second volume of his Wissenschaftslehre from 1837, the Bohemian philosopher, theologian, and mathematician Bernard Bolzano (1781-1848) introduced his concept of consequence, named derivability (Ableitbarkeit), together with a variety of theorems and further considerations. Derivability is an implication relation between sentences in themselves (Sätze an sich), which are not meant to be linguistic symbols but the contents of declarative sentences as well as of certain mental episodes. When Schmidt utters the sentence ‘Schnee ist weiß’, and Jones judges that snow is white, the sentence in itself expressed by Schmidt is the same as the one to which Jones agrees in thought. This sentence in itself is an abstract entity: in some sense, it exists; but it is unreal insofar as it lacks a position in space and time, does not stand in causal relationships, and is independent of the existence of thinking beings and languages. 3 Sentences in themselves are conceived by Bolzano as the primary bearers of the unrelativized truth-values true or false. This should be understood as meaning, first, other things, such as sentences or judgements, have their truth-values in virtue of the truth-values of the sentences in themselves which are their contents. Second, what is expressed by, e.g., ‘I am hungry’ in each case does not possess relativized truth-values like true/false with respect to person S at time t. It includes elements specifying a particular time and person, which makes it unqualifiedly true or false. Third, there are neither truth-value gaps nor a third truth-value (e.g., indeterminate): every sentence in itself is either true or false. All in all, sentences in themselves are identical with, or at least similar to, Frege’s thoughts. I will frequently use the shorter term ‘propositions’, and I will refer to them by putting sentences in square brackets. [3 is a prime number] is the proposition expressed by ‘3 is a prime number’. A sentence in itself consists of sub-propositional parts which Bolzano calls ideas in themselves (Vorstellungen an sich). [3 is a prime number] can be decomposed, among other things, into an idea of the number 3 and an idea of the property of being a prime number. These ideas in themselves are also neither
منابع مشابه
Bolzano versus Kant: mathematics as a scientia universalis
The paper will discuss some changes in Bolzano’s definition of mathematics attested in several quotations from the Beyträge, Wissenschaftslehre and Grössenlehre: is mathematics a theory of forms or a theory of quantities? Several issues that are maintained throughout Bolzano’s works will be distinguished from others that were accepted in the Beyträge and abandoned in the Grössenlehre. Changes w...
متن کاملExplanation in Metaphysics and Bolzano’s Theory of Ground and Consequence
In (2006a, 2006b), Benjamin Schnieder criticizes truthmaking as a relation between entities in the world and the truths those entities ‘make true’. In (2006b), his criticism exploits a notion of conceptual explanation that is very similar to Bolzano’s grounding. In the first part of this paper, I offer an analysis of Bolzano’s grounding. I discuss some open problems and argue that Bolzano’s gro...
متن کاملFrom constants to consequence, and back
Bolzano’s definition of consequence in effect associates with each set X of symbols (in a given interpreted language) a consequence relation ⇒X . We present this in a precise and abstract form, in particular studying minimal sets of symbols generating ⇒X . Then we present a method for going in the other direction: extracting from an arbitrary consequence relation ⇒ its associated set C⇒ of cons...
متن کاملBolzanian knowing: infallibility, virtue and foundational truth
The paper discusses Bernard Bolzano’s epistemological approach to believing and knowing with regard to the epistemic requirements of an axiomatic model of science. It relates Bolzano’s notions of believing, knowing and evaluation to his notions of infallibility, immediacy and foundational truth. If axiomatic systems require their foundational truths to be infallibly known, this knowledge involv...
متن کاملSempiternal Truth. The Bolzano-Twardowski-Lesniewski Axis
In 1913 Stanisław Leśniewski published his article on the sempiternity of truth, ‘Is Truth only Eternal or is it both Eternal and Sempiternal?’ (1913). The paper, directed against Kotarbiński’s ‘The Problem of the Existence of the Future’ (1913), made an important contribution to the debate on the excluded middle current in the Lvov circle in those years. The discussion involved at the same tim...
متن کامل